capjilo.blogg.se - Canon eos r vs canon 5d mark iv

#Canon eos r vs canon 5d mark iv full
#Canon eos r vs canon 5d mark iv iso

This is almost proportional to the difference in resolution, though, which makes sense. The number of focus points changes, at 4,779 to 5,655. They both have Canon’s Dual Pixel AF, which uses a pair of photodiodes in the sensor pixel to judge focus by phase detection. EOS R: Dual Pixel AF, 5,655 points, 8fpsĪutofocus style is at least very similar in these two cameras.EOS RP: Dual Pixel AF, 4,779 points, 5fps.And Canon is unlikely to want to establish any areas where the much cheaper camera seems on paper to outperform the higher-end one.Ĭanon EOS RP vs EOS R - AF and performance Lower resolution sensors will often allow slightly higher native settings, but here the res difference is fairly minor.

#Canon eos r vs canon 5d mark iv iso

Native ISO sensitivity is exactly the same too, at 100-40,000. Neither camera has in-body stabilisation. That comparison also more-or-less sums up the relationship between these two mirrorless cameras: it’s similar to where the 6D Mark II sits in relation to the 5D Mark IV. The EOS R’s is much closer to the EOS 5D Mark IV’s sensor. Canon has confirmed the RP uses the same sensor as the EOS 6D Mark II. These cameras have full-frame sensors but the EOS RP’s is slightly lower-res than the EOS R’s, at 26.2 megapixels to 30.3.

EOS R: 30.3-megapixel full-frame sensor.

EOS RP: 26.2-megapixel full-frame sensor.

Both displays have fully articulated touchscreen displays on the back, though, so the basics are similar. This isn’t quite a case of “standard definition” versus “4K”, but the EOS R will give you a sharper, preview image. The EOS R has a slightly larger 3.15-inch screen with resolution of 2.1-million dots, likely equivalent to 1020 x 680 pixels or similar. Its screen is a 1.04-million dot LCD, equivalent to 720 x 480 in pixels terms. However, this is the same resolution of viewfinder used in the Sony Alpha A7 III, so this downgrade is entirely predictable. You get a 0.5-inch, 3.69-million dot OLED EVF in the EOS R, a step-down 0.39-inch 2.36-million dot OLED in the EOS RP. Its viewfinder and rear LCD are less sharp. The Canon EOS RP doesn’t give you quite a good preview of your images as the EOS R.

EOS R: 3.15-inch LCD with 2.1 million-dot resolution, 0.5-inch viewfinder (3.69-million dot).

EOS RP: 3-inch LCD with 1.04 million-dot resolution, 0.39-inch viewfinder (2.36-million dot).

Related: Best cameras Canon EOS RP vs Canon EOS R - Screen and Viewfinder Version 2.0 tends to offer real-world max transfer rates of around 33MB/s, which will seem slow if you want to move over a lot of files from a fast SD card. The EOS R has a much better USB interface, though, with USB 3.1 to the RP’s USB 2.0. Both have weather-sealed bodies with a magnesium alloy shell. You don’t miss out on weather proofing or build fundamentals either. If you currently use an entry-level DSLR or a compact camera, you should find the Canon EOS RP easier to slide into using. It has a traditional mode dial, and no top LCD display. Its other controls and top plate are a little closer to those of a lower-end, or at least more accessible, camera too. The EOS R has a programmable Fn touch bar that is easy to operate with a thumb, if not exactly essential. And with the EOS RP, it strays from the classic design just slightly more. And who doesn’t like a camera that is easy to carry around? It’s also much lighter than the EOS R, at 485g to 660g, with battery and SD inside.Ĭanon made the EOS R with a deliberate through line from EOS full-frame DSLRs. You lose some of the classic DSLR styling of the EOS R as a result, but the dimensions are much closer to those of the Sony Alpha A7 III.

It is significantly smaller, particularly in height and depth. Still, there is a real appeal to the RP’s frame. EOS R: 135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4mm, 660g, USB 3.1Ī lot of this comparison is going to focus on the ways the Canon EOS RP isn’t quite as good as the EOS R.Related: Best mirrorless cameras Canon EOS RP vs Canon EOS R - Dimensions But does it cut too many corners? Here’s how it compares to its more premium sibling. That’s a lot of spare change to go towards lenses.

You’ll pay £1399, body-only, for the RP, or £2349 for the EOS R.

If you’re familiar with Canon’s DSLRs, you can think of the EOS RP as the 6D Mark II to the EOS R’s 5D Mark IV.Īnd if you aren’t, you’ll be pleased to hear that the EOS RP is just under £1,000 less than the EOS R. There are cut-back parts in almost every area, but as this is still a full-frame camera, its image quality will still be excellent with the right lens. And, for some at least, it should prove much more interesting as it’s not just slightly cheaper. The Canon EOS RP is a more affordable alternative to the EOS R.

#Canon eos r vs canon 5d mark iv full

Is Canon’s cheaper full frame mirrorless camera worth buying?